Funny thing about black and white.
You mix it together and you get grey.
And it doesn't matter how much white
you try and put back in, you're never
going to get anything but grey.
-Lilah Morgan, Angel: Habeas Corpses
Showing posts with label Vampires. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vampires. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2009

True Blood, "Gay Issues", and Good Christian People

Alright so this week’s blog is late because I’m busy trying to tie up loose ends before I head to NYC on Saturday with the BF. We’ll be there for 9 (count ‘em NINE) days, so next week’s blog will come to you all the way from the Big Apple. Since I’ve never been east of Indiana (unless you count those trips to FL, but since we didn’t leave the state…) it promises to be one of those life changing experiences. So we’ll see.

I’ve been looking around for some interesting news stories and things to comment about and I found a lot if disparate issues in very small news stories. I also would like to write a small review on the beginning of Season 1 of
True Blood.

I managed to procure a legitimate copy of the first season of this new vampire series which is being produced/aired or whatever on HBO. I figured since I wasn’t going to be getting into Twilight anytime soon I should at least get some sort of vampy thing to slake my thirst. (I have a feeling bad puns are going to be floating around this post a lot). I’m unsure if you’d want to read the review, because there are going to be some spoilers, so you’ve been forewarned.

Granted I’ve only had the time to see the first 3 episodes, and I already thing that the whole show has a really good feel to it. I especially like the fact that the vampires have severe weaknesses, which could actually kill them. Most notably, they never go out in the sun. Another thing which I think is very interesting is that in the beginning they show one of those signs that are in front of churches where you can customize the letters, and the sign reads “God Hates Fangs”. One of the more overarching issues of the show is the issue of vampire equality, now that vampires have “come out of the coffin” and wanted to become a part of society. This mirrors in a huge way the struggles facing the gay community at this point in history. Even more poignantly the fact that a sign that reads “God Hates Fangs” is only one letter away from letting people know that God also hates cigarettes from the UK. But overall, after 3 episodes, I like it. I think its going to be a decent show, especially with all the vampire hype. The only thing that I wish was explained more was how that damn waitress got to be telepathic in the first place… I also am tickled to say that I love the whole feel of the show, from the attitude of some of the characters to the fact that there’s even a black gay character. One con, I suppose would have to be the preoccupation with sex, as that seems to be the favorite pastime in the little imaginary town of Bon Temps, LA. You can’t go 5 minutes in the show without seeing someone banging someone else. Kinda irritating, but the boys are good to look at so I suppose that makes it okay…sort of.

In the same vein (there’s those puns again) as talking about True Blood, I discovered
this story about the author of the Sookie Stackhouse novels, which are what the television series True Blood is based on. I like the fact that she seems like she’s just a (forgive the expression) “down home” southern lady, who’s just a writer of fictions. But I also think that if those books are as good as they seem to be (I have yet to have the pleasure of reading them, but HBO made a series out of them!) then she’s a literary genius. Okay, well maybe not a literary genius, but at least she has some good sense to write about something of which there is already a huge hype about.

Moving away from True Blood, (which I’ll say again, is amazing. Makes me want to get HBO since they also did Six Feet Under, which I didn’t find out about until after it was over, so that I can watch these shows. Which annoyed me) there are a few interesting, and very small stories that I’d would like to comment on.

I’m wondering if the bigger issue with
this article should be more about the rights of business owners to turn away customers or about sexuality. On the one hand, I can see how this is just a huge ploy for some major gay publicity, but at the same time I can see where the one owner, Zaharakis, is coming from. Speaking as a gay man who goes out clubbing (probably more that I would like to admit) I don’t want to go out and see a bunch of women partying it up. I go out because I like to people watch and I like the eye candy, and a bunch of women who are celebrating heteronuptuals and feel like they can get totally plastered because there’s no chance that they’re going to be taken advantage of in a gay bar, are not my idea of a good time. But, and I’m glad the article mentions the other side of the issue, in that some business owners may want to tap that market such as Binninger, who then started offering a whole night for women who want to do that. I suppose that’s the wonders of the Capitalist society of the US. Notice this is also happening in Chicago, pretty close to where I live.

Even closer is this
story, which I cannot believe. Not only am I infuriated about this issue because it’s an issue that is essentially a “gay” issue, and in my home state no less. It’s also against everything I believe as a bibliophile because it’s a total throwback to the middle ages. I would like to think that we as a society and a culture, and an intelligent race have moved beyond the need to destroy literature simply because we don’t like what it says. Not only that, but it’s also a censorship issue, which I’m also against, because books are written to be read. If you don’t like the subject matter, don’t read the book. Problem solved. If you read the article take note of this passage (Please note that this is a direct quotation from the source, and not in any way altered by me, nor does it reflect my views or ideas):

“The CCLU claim describes Baby Be-Bop as “explicitly vulgar, racial, and
anti-Christian,” and charges that the four plaintiffs, “all of whom are elderly,
claim their mental and emotional well-being was damaged by this book at the
library” because the book contains the word "nigger" and derogatory sexual and
political epithets that can incite violence and “put one’s life in possible
jeopardy, adults and children alike.”

So a few questions that I have about this are what are elderly people doing in the young adult section of the library anyway? And provided they were there with grandchildren, why are they calling attention to this instead of just ignoring it? I’ve been in libraries before, if you ignore something (a book) it’ll get lost and ignored in the depths of the stacks. Not only that, but they claim that “their mental and emotional well-being was damaged by this book…” What did they do, read it? Again, if you don’t like the subject matter, why read the book? They also claim that it’s anti-Christian. Having never read the book, I can’t say that for sure. But I can infer from the language used that they are attacking it on those grounds due to the added clout/publicity that it gives the suit and also because the book deals with homosexuality. In regards to the N-word that the book uses, I have yet to see a group of elderly people want to change the language in Tom Sawyer or Huck Finn, which I have read, and also contain that word in a derogatory term. As far as people’s lives being in jeopardy, I can only say that the only way people’s lives will be in jeopardy is if we allow this sort of censorship to occur and keep knowledge away from the masses. It is ignorance that causes violence, not knowledge, at least in the wider sense.

An addendum to this, which is more of a story than anything else: I remember when I was younger, my mother was very into watching the television show
The Waltons and there was one episode that really stuck out in my mind. It was an episode that was set during WWII and the hype surrounding the Nazi’s and their regime. These good Christian folks living on the mountain got wrapped up in a hate filled mob and decided to go out and find all the German books they could and burn them. Well one of the Walton kids, who also discovered a woman living nearby that could read/speak German, was very upset about the book burning, and got this woman to read from a book and translate. What she was reading was the Bible, in German, which these Christian people were horrified to discover they were about to burn.

Another issue we have with good Christian people, and homosexuality is
this story. I think this is a sham, and totally uncalled for. I agree with what James Cole says about this opening a can of worms that cannot easily be closed about how therepists and counselors deal with clients. Not only that, but it was my understanding that as someone who provides such services, you have a duty and are ethically bound to help the people who come to you. And if you can’t help them, due to whatever issue you are unable to help them, you’re ethically bound to refer them to someone who can help them. This crap about not having to even refer someone based on the fact that their sexual orientation or some other issue somehow causes problems due to the religious beliefs of the therapist is crap. I’ll have to keep an eye on this story to see what happens.

And finally,
this story illustrates just how crazy school administrators and things can be. While there are children being bullied for even appearing/seeming to be gay by the perceptions of others, and committing suicide, school officials would rather keep a student from graduating for a little showboating at a graduation ceremony. I think this is a total waste of time and resources, and it effectively illustrates the skewed priorities of our educational administrators and those in charge of school policy. Stop worrying about little things like this and start worrying about the lives of the children in your care!

Next week: Blog from NYC!

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

A whole week of nothing but AI, Prop 8, and Twilight

So here I am, sitting at work realizing that it's Wednesday and I need to update. All while dealing with being buried under a buttload of work at work. Not that I'm complaining. Having lots of things to do while at work is job security. This is a good thing.

I also realized that I haven't been able to/interested in reading much of the news, because my experience with the news lately has been nothing outside of listening to things about American Idol,Prop 8 stuff, and listening to my mother and my sister tell me how amazing Twilight is. And while I'm an avid Anti-Idolater (cute huh?), an empathize-r to my people regarding the whole gay marriage issue in CA and a die-hard vampire purist, I have to say, when am I going to stop hearing about it?

Before I get off on a tangent, let me just say that I think
this is a horrible thing. Something like this would be akin to a school not allowing a report to be presented on...oh...I don't know...Martin Luther King Jr. because he upset the social norm. Well yeah...that's the idea of civil reform...at least that's how I work with it. Even better would be the prohibition of a report on George Washington because he was a rebel against his sovereign government. To deny a student who but in the work to come up with a report/presentation on a political figure that has been brought to light by recent movies and whatnot is just horrible and goes lengths to destroy a child's creative and autonomous spirit. I'm very happy that she made a big deal out of it, because it is a big deal.

Moving on...

American Idol is one thing that just really gets me. I've been polite up until now, listening to the whole of Idol stars and their mostly horrible voices become music phenomena that have taken the world by storm. Goody for you. I still think that Kelly Clarkson has the most horrible voice ever. And while I'm pleased that Kris Allen (I think that's how you spell his name) won AI, because I thought he was the cuter of the two finalists, once he won I had hoped that would be the last that I heard about it.

But, of course, that could not be. Adam Lambert who was purportedly gay, and did nothing to dispel or confirm rumors of his sexuality was very popular. Now let me say that I dislike Adam Lambert because he used his sexuality and the ambiguity surrounding it (not to mention the pictures of him kissing other boys) to sort of clinch the gay vote (which I assume is not small considering AI). It was sort of a shitty marketing ploy to get people to think that he was gay, without actually coming out to say it. While I applaud people who actually say and think that their sexuality is nobody else's business but their own, I cannot abide by being purposefully ambiguous about it in order to become popular. BAD move Adam. And of course now, people are saying that the whole final voting thing was rigged. Uh...DUH? Hello? American Idol uses telephone votes...and it just occurred to you people now that the whole thing could be rigged? Hrm, the collective intelligence of AI supporters and fans is suspicious...

Of course no blog this week would be complete without me mentioning the failed Prop 8 ruling in CA. While I'm not a huge fan of gay marriage (see previous posts about my stance, since there aren't that many of them) I still empathize. Even I can see that this is a huge step backwards in the fight for equality. But, like a great many people, Dan Savage among them, I would think that patience would be a much better reaction than some other militants who would claim that marching all over the place and burning and killing people/things would solve anything. As Dan points out, its slow (agonizingly) but we're gaining ground. I've no doubt that we'll see a vast majority of rulings in the favor of equality in my lifetime. Which is good, but like all civil rights battles it takes time. Patience is a virtue that in regards to our rights as out and proud homosexuals we will afford.

Alright. Now this issue might be a bit touchy, but probably less so than the whole AI issue. My mother and my sister are devout Twilight readers and supporters, etc... They have also managed to corrupt my roommate into this literary fad. I myself, refuse to have anything at all to do with this drivel. Not only does the fact that it was even published show the degradation of American Literature, but it's also a bastardization of centuries of vampire lore! Most notably, vampires out in the sun without immolation? WTF?! NO, NO, and NO! From conception of the vampire monster, sunlight has been fatal for a vampire. They are creatures of the night, whether they are sensual or feral, beautiful of beastly, sunlight has always been a HUGE no no for vamps. While I'll agree that interpretations of the whole sunlight thing are okay [read: Buffy, Angel, Underworld, etc...] the fact remains that any significant amount of sunlight exposure causes vampires to become barbecue. To have them glisten or sparkle or whatever the hell she has them doing in sunlight other than become bonfires is to spit in the face of centuries of vampire myth, legend, and lore and does nothing but cause avid vampire enthusiasts to boycott your book.

Now it was recently pointed out to me by a friend that it's all make believe anyway, so why get up in arms. The problem comes when somebody decides to change centuries of lore. That would be like somebody rewriting the Bible. It just doesn't work. And there should be rules governing who can change these things about myth and legend. Of course that leads us to a free speech and censorship argument, but I'm not talking of banning rule changes, but presenting reasons why you want to change them, especially with centuries of lore saying the opposite! Not to mention that I liked vampires before they became the cool thing to like. Kinda like this webcomic indicates. That's my sentiment...the lawsuit notwithstanding.

Blah. I'm done. I promise I'll have something more productive next week.